The final write up stages of the PhD!

writing up.jpg
PhD thesis chapters and feedback (just some of them)

Yesterday I hit a milestone in my PhD. I finished the draft of my discussion chapter. For me, this marks the end of the ‘difficult’ writing of my thesis as my tasks now involve the write up of my conclusion and introductions, then beginning the process of editing the whole thing down (this will technically be my full first draft, but not the full draft that will go to my supervisors). We have set a deadline for mid-July to have all of the initial editing done so that my supervisors can then take a look at my (technically second) full draft and give me feedback on the whole thing.

The past few weeks of writing have not been easy. I am juggling part time PhD write up with a full time job. This is not an easy feat given that the stage of writing that I am currently at is one of the toughest (i.e. I am brining everything together to make sense). Now the main overall output of my PhD is the development of a framework to explain how innovative work behaviour can be enhanced within organisations (i.e. including the factors that influence this relationship). Once I have this and my recommendations, my doctoral study will be complete (to me). My write-up, however, will not be. My discussions chapter is leading up to this framework development. I have been able to discuss the themes that have emerged from my qualitative and quantitative data analysis and explore these in terms of comparison with prior literature. However, one thing I have found hard is giving specific details of the contributions of my PhD (although I am able to talk about these quite well). I know that these contributions will be highlighted in my conclusions but I need these to be evident within my discussion so that I (and my examiners) know there has been a point to the last 3.5 years of work.

write up 3.jpg
Some workings from my statistical analyses (for my findings chapters)

Since I started my new job in November, the changes to my PhD write up and lifestyle have been significant and you do not realise how much things have to change. For example, Saturday is now part of my working week. I work 6 out of 7 days so that I can get my working week done and my PhD written up. I have an amazing work team who are flexible in allowing me to work all of my hours across four days and take one week day per week as a PhD day. My husband and I now automatically plan things round my weekend PhD day and this is something we never thought we would do (as an early stage PhD student I would always refuse to work weeks as I never felt it was necessary after a full week of PhD work).

For me (and my PhD progression) this change has been vital to allow me to get my much needed writing done. I am utterly grateful that my employer has also allowed me to take some unpaid leave to give my PhD work an extra boost. This unpaid leave is short term (only a few days over the space of three months) but I am finding the time extra valuable for these final stages of my write up and I appreciate all of the things that my employer is helping me to do. Now it’s not at all a requirement that employers have to consider PhD student write up when hiring, but my employer did. This has been considered form day 1 of my role and it is something that I feel has been important to make sure that I manage my employment and PhD time during the week well (I truly appreciate efforts from all involved).

write up 2
That moment I had to start again…

One thing I am finding vital at this stage of my write-up is the support I am receiving (from everywhere). My colleagues at work ask how my PhD is coming along and this shows me that they have some interest in my work. My supervisors ask how my (non-PhD) work is coming along and how I am learning/developing in my role. I suppose this is just so they can make sure that I am not taking on too much but also so they know I am progressing with the writing I am supposed to do. My family and friends could not offer more support. My Nana and Granda ask how ‘my book is coming along’ because they have seen the end product from my sister’s PhD. My Mam, Dad and Sister provide endless FaceTime’s, calls, texts and visits so that I do not go insane. My husband has taken most of the household burden (cooking, cleaning etc) whilst he is working full time too. He keeps joking about his new found full-time working house-husband duties he has acquired whilst I move forward to the final stages of my PhD.

As I move into the very final stages of my PhD write up I reflect upon how far I have come in the last 3.5 years. I will be starting my introduction next week After publishing this blog post I wrote the introduction to my PhD so next week I will be moving onto writing the conclusion chapter. after and once that is all done After this, it is edit edit edit edit (supervisors feedback) edit dit edit edit until I have a ‘book’ that I am proud of.

My PhD journey (I am approximately half way up the final mountain)

Fully funded PhD studentship in work-based learning at Edinburgh Napier University!


Are you interested in work-based learning environments and how they foster industry-relevant skill development and improve economic performance? If so, we have the perfect opportunity for you!

We are re-advertising a fully-funded PhD place within the Centre for Social Informatics at Edinburgh Napier University for an October 2019 start date. The closing date for applications is Tuesday 7th May 2019 with interviews to be held on Wednesday 5th June 2019. 

As part of the studentship you will develop new knowledge and practical methods for evaluating the impact of work-based learning (WBL) on industry performance. This addresses a need for outcome-based measures to assess long-term benefits of WBL.

You will adopt a mixed-methods approach to the empirical work. You will design, develop and shape the exact methods yourself but the aim is that the work will include a nation-wide survey that will be deployed to gather quantitative data on the current provision and perceived impact of WBL in industry. It is proposed that you will then sample 3-5 firms (of different sizes and sectors from the quantitative survey participants) and use qualitative methods such as direct observation, interviews and focus groups to explore these relationships further.

This opportunity is a Skills Development Scotland Collaborative award offered through the Scottish Graduate School of Social Science (SGSSS) and is therefore funded through a collaborative partnership between the Economic and Social Research Council and Skills Development Scotland.

Interested in applying for this fantastic opportunity?

You can find the advert for the studentship on the SGSSS website here:

We are also advertising the studentship here too:


Skills Development Scotland PhD Networking Event – March 2019



Networking event broch

Yesterday I was invited to attend and speak at the SDS PhD Networking Event (the 2018 event information can be found here). These events are held each year and are designed to bring students, academics and practitioners together to hear about the work of the PhD students on the SGSSSSDS collaborative PhD studentship programme. The 2019 brochure can be found here and you can see that there are an interesting mix of research projects studied on the scheme.

The day itself went well and we heard from a variety of speakers from SGSSS, SDS and also The University of Warwick too (you can see the full programme in the images attached to this blog post). We were welcomed to the event by Gordon McGuinness, Director of Industry & Enterprise Networks at Skills Development Scotland who introduced our first speaker, Eugene Gallanagh, Senior Director of Enabling Services. Eugene explained how the PhD programme was developed to break down silos, encourage collaboration around research on skills. He continued to explain that there are 21 studentships, 3 graduates with 5 nearing completion (that includes me!). Eugene emphasised the long term investment needed in research and the applicability of this research to both academic and practice (something that could not be done without the support of the amazing set of supervisors currently on the SDS programme – including mine Professor Hazel Hall, Dr Laura Muir and Professor Robert Raeside). Eugene also emphasised the wonderful development opportunities that PhD students can undertake, including the internship opportunities offered by SGSSS (see more info on my experiences here).

SDS Networking Event introductions

We then heard from Professor Mhairi Mackenzie, Deputy Director (Studentships) at the Scottish Graduate School of Social Science (SGSSS). Mhairi focused on the benefits of collaboration as part of the studentships and the impact that the students can have across Scotland (e.g. for policy and practice).  The focus of conversation here was also of the importance of the relationship with SDS and academics. SDS develop the research ideas (i.e. the general research questions) where they feel more research is needed and the academics step in and support this by creating research projects for PhD students to undertake (just like the ones we have advertised in our department here: This collaboration is really important as it helps to bridge the gap between academic work and the application to practice by including everyone in the collaborative proves from the start. Mhairi also explained the student-centred approach from SGSSS and the dedicated team it takes to undertake the work they do. She highlighted this with relevance to the success of the collaborative programme due to input of policy and practice into the development of research themes to be addressed in doctoral studies.

Event programme

Mhairi was followed by Professor Chris Warhurst, Director of the Warwick Institute for Employment Research. Initially, I was not sure whether I would enjoy his talk, until I realised how relevant his work was to mine (and so did my Director of Studies as can be seen in this tweet!). Chris has a current project which focuses on innovation as related to job qualities. Chris spoke about this work (more info on the project here) including the areas in which he and his team have explored on the project, and why. I very much enjoyed this talk, mostly because of the overlap between Chris’s work and my own work. For example, Chris and his team have carried out extensive statistical analysis of the Community Innovation Survey, something which I have done (on a smaller PhD size scale of course, see my poster of the findings here!). Additionally, Chris has focused on qualitative work too to explore some of the factors that influence the job quality and innovation relationship (publications can be found on the tab at the top of this page Although I am not exploring job quality in my work, some of the things that Chris talked about got agreement from me. For example, Chris spoke about difficulties in getting access to data (like I did!) and the complexity of the term innovation (e.g. much work uses different definitions, types and methods making comparability difficult). I recall that in my first year of my PhD making attempts to define innovation was difficult and there was far too much literature to explore. However, I was pleased to hear that Chris mentioned the definitions by the OECD, the definitions which I have used too to help to set the context to my work. I was pleased that Chris spoke about this work as I can now see the relevance of my work to both SDS work and practice, and the importance of the work academically.

We then heard from two SDS PhD student Alumni, Dr Bozena Wielgoszewska and Dr John Mowbray. Both speakers talked about their PhD journeys, the work they did and also the work they do now. Both currently work in academic (John at the University of Glasgow and Bozena at University College London) so we heard about the current work they are involved in. Both (ex) students gave some advice to students on the current programme and I summarise these below:

·         Be persistent (within reason) – it take a lot of time and effort to complete a PhD, persistence is key but also taking a break every now and then is needed;

·         It is important to participate in external/additional activities too as this can help when applying for job in the future (e.g. workshops conferences, publishing, presenting, programme committee memberships, teaching);

·         Undertaking an internship can help to see how research can be applied to non-academic practice (I believe both students did so as part of their PhD journeys).

This advice is something I would agree with to!

Our final speaker was Sandra Cheyne, CMS Policy & Professional Practice Manager at SDS. Sandra talked about people and the current labour market are changing and we need to ensure that people have skills to manage their careers in this environment. Sandra highlighted the importance of lifelong career management skills and emphasised the importance of good career information advice and guidance research as part of career and careers advice development. As a careers adviser myself (in a past life pre-PhD), I completely agree with Sandra and her comments.

I, unfortunately, did not get to see any of the breakout sessions that followed because I was presenting my work in one session instead. From my slides (here) you can see that I gave an overview of my work (e.g. main concepts, literature and methods) and also talked a little about my case study findings. This was followed by some questions on my work. I was asked about my main focus (i.e. individual or collective innovation), my use of a validated scale to measure workplace learning and innovation activities and also about my use of demographics (i.e. whether I am exploring the relationship between demographics and innovative work behaviour). These were good questions as they got me thinking about my methods and why I am doing what I am doing, and whether I should have done something different. Overall, the presentation was well reived although we were slightly behind time during the day so I did not have as much time to explain things in as much detail as I would have liked. That being said, I think the awareness for my PhD and the engagement process involved in presenting my work was a beneficial process overall.


Photo credit Gillian Wylie (Evaluation and Research Executive, SDS).

To end the day, we had lunch (of course) and the PhD student posters were judged. The posters were judged on academic quality, effective and accessible communication of research ideas, and how engaging and thought-provoking the posters are. I am very pleased to say that I won second place prize for my poster (also on the SDS website) which was quite a nice win of the day for our team (we do have a PhD student reputation to maintain in our research group you know!). First prize went to Bozena (I’m sure her poster will be added to the SDS website in due course).

So if you fancy undertaking a PhD like I have done, please do see our two vacancies we have in our research group (details in links below):

Blog post (Prof Hazel Hall):

My own blog post:

You can also find out about out amazing research group here if this blog post has not persuaded you to apply:


(Please note, some specific information was taken from tweets by Prof Hazel Hall, @hazelh)

Come and study in the wonderful Centre for Social Informatics of Edinburgh Napier University!



The Centre for Social Informatics now have two PhD studentships advertised and we are looking for some fabulous candidates just like you!

It was nearly 4 years ago (back in early 2015) when Professor Hazel Hall, Director of CSI, advertised a studentship in workplace learning and innovation. The studentship was a collaborative studentship between The Scottish Graduate School of Social Science and Skills Development Scotland through their collaborative studentship partnership and we are currently advertising two new studentships in the same scheme.

I was the lucky person who was awarded a studentship back in 2015 and I have been part of the team ever since. I have been fortunate to study alongside a great (and very welcoming!) group of PhD students and academic staff. Each of us has our own research expertise and are always interested to hear about something new (especially if it is from new research).

The PhD studentships advertised below are part of the same great funding scheme as mine. As part of the studentship you will study on a research project that you enjoy (but that you also help to shape) and also have some wonderful opportunities to grow as a researcher. During the last 3.5 years of my study I have been able to do so many things and I am thankful for the opportunities that I have had – some PhD students on other funding schemes may not have these opportunities. For example I have travelled locally and internationally for conferences (Aberdeen, Zadar in Croatia, Krakow and also Vancouver late last year). I have also been able to collect data outside of Scotland, firstly in an NHS Trust in England and secondly in Finland during a trip in 2017. And of course, I must not forget the paid internship with the Scottish Government that I was able to complete last year.

As students we also have a lot of support available for the PhD study. This comes from the SGSSS itself, Skills Development Scotland (through the appointment of a staff member/sponsor for every student), our supervisors and also our peers. Our more experienced academics have a lot of faith in the abilities of their students (i.e. us), they encourage us to try for things we may feel impossible and they also support us greatly with the challenges of PhD study (for example the hours spent giving feedback on copious amounts of thesis chapter drafts, conference submissions and documents to make our writing perfect). I am very grateful to be part of such a supportive research group and you could be too.

In the Centre for Social Informatics we currently have two studentships advertised. Further details can be found below.


Career information literacy and decision-making behaviours of young people

The main aim of this doctoral study is to generate new knowledge on career development learning with reference to decision-making amongst young people in S2-S6 (aged 12-18) who are preparing for their lives beyond school education. As well as developing theoretical insight, the findings will contribute to the effective design and delivery of enhanced careers services that take into account the means by which these young people recognise, respond to, and make decisions about varied learning and career opportunities.

You can find out more about the studentship, including how to apply, here:


Work-based learning environments (WBLE) for fostering industry-relevant skills and optimal economic performance

The aim of the proposed studentship project is to develop new knowledge and practical methods for evaluating the impact of work-based learning (WBL) on industry performance. It addresses a need for outcome-based measures to assess long-term benefits of WBL. The research will survey the extent of current provision and impact of WBL in Scottish industry and analyse the attributes of WBL that contribute to improved productivity and performance.  A novel approach to measuring the impact of WBL on firm performance will be explored. Rather than take a purely skills perspective (i.e. mapping skills and outputs), the focus will be on measuring maturity of ‘expansive’ work-based learning environments (WBLE) that include educational providers and sectoral bodies and that demonstrate ‘Industry 4.0’ characteristics in their use of real-time data and context-sensitive information to create an optimal learning experience which leads to increased productivity.

You can find out more about the studentship, including how to apply, here:

Please do take a look at these great opportunities. I did back in 2015 and have not looked back!

Lyndsey’s PhD from January to December 2018!

ec7d3317-a580-499a-9163-c56cbd4a7859It is January 2019 and I am currently feeling a little flat after being poorly over my ‘Christmas and new year break’ and feeling like my PhD has not progressed since this time last year. I have decided to reflect upon my 2018 PhD journey and the milestones I have reached throughout the year to prove to myself that I did make some progress after all. So here it goes…

January 2018

In January 2018 I managed to finish ALL PHD DATA COLLECTION. This included data collection in Scotland (a large case study), data collection in Finland (a small case study) and finally data collection in England (another small case study). My data collection was fully complete by mid-January, ticking off one milestone in the PhD journey. This was particularly satisfying as it was a struggle to organise the final case study, get ethics passed and finally organise the data collection at a time and place to suit me and my participants.

In January I also submitted two applications for the SGSSS internship schemes. I submitted one for Skills Development Scotland and one for the Scottish Government scheme in the hope that I may be offered one.

My final January milestone was the decision to start applying for jobs. I did not really know what I was looking for, or whether this would be part time or full time, but I knew that submission would be looming later in the year and decided that I wanted to start and prepare for this very early (but please note I did not actually apply for anything in January 2018).

February 2018

In February 2018 I was offered two internships – one from each scheme that I applied to. I was pleased with both offers and struggled to decide which one to take as I really liked the sound of both projects. Eventually, I decided to take the internship with the Scottish Government as I knew this would broaden my horizons employability wise and I knew I already had some experience in working with Skills Development Scotland as my main PhD funders. Reflecting back on this I definitely chose the correct project for me and my career.

In February 2018 I also got married. This was something very important and I have the best team around me who understood completely when I said that my (now) husband and I wanted to do this (even though it may distract me from my PhD a little).

March 2018

In March 2018, I submitted a poster to the ISIC: The Information Behaviour Conference. This was kind of a good milestone but kind of not. I had planned to submit a paper to the conference but lost all of my data analysis that I had completed for this paper and this meant the submission deadline would not be met. Either way, I was able to submit a poster to another international conference even though I had hoped for a paper. Alongside this I also submitted to the ISIC doctoral workshop to present my work, and discuss my PhD with other PhD students and academic mentor.

Towards the end of March I attended the iConference held in Sheffield. I had not submitted to present a paper or poster as my data collection and analysis had nothing new in it yet but I submitted to the doctoral workshop as a chance to share my work with the iSchool academics and students.

Whilst in Sheffield, Skills Development Scotland held a networking event in Glasgow. This was a change for PhD students to share their work with others, academics and SDS staff. I was unable to attend this in person due to being in Sheffield but was able to present a poster of my work here (from afar).

April to June 2018

From April to June 2018, I suspended my PhD study to undertake my PhD internship with the Scottish Government. This was valuable experience and something I would recommend all PhD students consider doing (if/when possible). Whilst I was working on my internship, several milestones were reached over the three months:

  1. I applied for a place at the ASIS&T 2018 doctoral workshop in Vancouver;
  2. I submitted a paper for the ASIS&T conference in Vancouver to present the findings of my Finnish case study;
  3. I presented my PhD work at iDocQ in Edinburgh;
  4. I found out that my ISIC poster submission had been accepted;
  5. I found out that my ISIC doctoral workshop application was accepted;
  6. I found out that my ASIS&T paper was accepted (a major milestone as the acceptance rate was only 49% and it’s a very well established conference to present a paper at);

Before I started my internship (in around March 2018), I submitted an application to the Scottish Government for an Assistant Statistician post. During my internship I was assessed and was offered a full time role in May 2019. By the end of my internship in June 2018, I had agreed between my supervisors, funders and my university research department that I would begin my post at the Government in November 2018.

July 2018

In July 2018 I submitted my ASIS&T paper revisions and these were formally accepted. I was also accepted onto into the ASIS&T doctoral workshop and was awarded funding for this workshop and the full ASIST conference.

August and September 2018

Between August and September I worked tirelessly to get all of my data (interviews, focus groups and survey) analysed. Once analysed, I drafted all three findings chapters and submitted my larger case study for feedback from my supervisors. This brought the total drafted thesis chapters to seven out of ten to write in total.

October 2018

October 2018 was particularly busy. I drafted and practiced my ASIS&T presentation as this was an important one to get right and I was the only person from Napier attending the conference so I knew I had prepare and present well.

In early October I also travelled to Krakow, Poland to present my poster at the ISIC: Information Behaviour conference and attend the doctoral workshop. These were both good opportunities to get feedback on my doctoral work and my empirical findings in the ISIC community.

As students one thing we forget is that we are learning all of the time. In October, with the help of one of my supervisors I learned how to carry out and write up a binary logistic regression. This is a milestone for me as, although I have been taught this technique before, I have never needed to use it in my work. Now I have and am able to write this up with confidence!

A final thing I did in October was present a short PowerPoint on research impact within the PhD to some of our PhD students. This was part of a workshop series from 2017 and symbolised the end of the series itself.

November 2018

I think November 2018 was the busiest of my PhD. Firstly, I travelled to Vancouver, Canada for a week and took part in the ASIS&T conference. This involved taking part in the doctoral workshop and discussion my work with an academic mention. Two days after this I presented my paper at the same conference, which was received very well. The paper proceedings were published soon after and can be accessed by ASIS&T members at the moment.

The second major milestone was dropping my PhD down to part time to begin my job as an Assistant Statistician in the Scottish Government. This has been challenging at times, but something which appears to have worked out best for both my work and also my PhD (as long as I can still make PhD progress in 2019 of course!).

As well as starting my new job, I was also able to present my PhD work and discuss my ASIS&T paper with the knowledge management students at my university (twice). This was a good opportunity to share my work and get students thinking about writing a conference paper from PhD findings. It was lovely to be invited into the class to have this opportunity.

December 2018

December’s progress was slow. However, I managed to finish a redraft of my Finnish case study findings chapter and also make a start on my final findings chapter redraft.

I decided to review my progress from 2018 and this blog post was formed from what I found. It has not been all that bad really!

So this review takes my total of international conferences to five (2 based in the UK, 2 in Europe and 1 in Canada), and increased my count of counties visited by three (so far we have Zadar in Croatia, Finland, Krakow in Poland, Vancouver in Canada and various locations across England and Scotland).

So I will not give too many details of that I aim to do in 2019 PhD wise but the picture below might give some clues…



From PhD student to Statistician and everything in between

statistician imageYou may recall that back in May I received some good news career wise and I was offered a job at the Scottish Government. You may also recall that my start date for my new job was whilst I was still writing up my PhD so I would be moving to work full time and write up my PhD on a part time basis.

This move from academia (as a PhD student) to a fully-fledged non-academic employee elsewhere was somewhat daunting but I have managed fairly well (I think). My first week in my new post was riddled with jet lag from my trip to Vancouver but this has since, thankfully, gone completely. The trip to Vancouver was great and I have benefited tremendously from it, however, I had not anticipated the effect of the jet-lag and how long it would last. When I returned from Vancouver, I managed to have some form of normality over the weekend (meals, bedtime etc) ready to start my new job on the Monday. The Monday was great, I felt energetic and excited (although a little nervous) for my new job and all the things I would be doing. The jet-lag, however, had other ideas and on the Tuesday I was absolutely floored (but I did manage to stay at work – and awake – all day). Admittedly, I was expecting it to hit at some point at work but I had no idea that it would make me feel so sick, on edge and in need of a long lie down after I had finished for the day. I also had no idea that it would get better during the week (it did, I am pleased to say), then get worse at the weekend just as the PhD work should be done.

IMG_6576So in my first week as an employed non-academic and part time PhD student I was able to complete a full week at work. I was also able to contribute to a class at my university (on my PhD day away from work), present my work to the students and take questions from the students about the conference paper I had just presented the week before. I was also able to get a little PhD writing done too. By the end my PhD day I was absolutely cabbaged and in need of some rest. My rest came in the form of a weekend off and some advice to take it easy so that I could recuperate… starting a new job and learning lots of new things is tough on the brain you know! The next couple of weeks in my job were much better in terms of the jet lag and I have just say managed to get some PhD work too. This is a schedule I am trying to still figure out…

I sat this morning and worked out my schedule (days at work and days of PhD) for the next few months. I have the next 24 weeks planned out in my work and academic calendars and that is it. When those 24 weeks are up (technically 48 working days which is not a lot!) I am officially over my personal submission limit and then I will have to think about what I need to do next. Until then, I must just get on with it, not complain and not get sick (she says).

I know that this all would not be possible without the support from my supervisors along the way from day 1. I cannot thank Hazel, Laura and Robert enough or firstly sending me the email with the job advert in and then supporting me when they found out that I had been offered a post (I told nobody except immediate family that I had been offered a place at an assessment centre with the Scottish Government as I assumed I would not be successful first time around). This whole part-time PhD thing was probably a shock to them all (you know, the perfectly behaved PhD student that I am and all hahaha!) and I can guess that they may have been concerned at first (probably one more than the others). However, none of them showed this to me (if they felt anything negative about me getting a job before submitting my PhD) and they have been supportive and helped me sort out all of the ins and outs of moving to part time PhD life (this included liaising with my two funders, my university research office, my supervisors and the government recruitment service to agree some kind of terms and conditions). I also had great internship supervisors who supported me during the assessment procedure and my currently team for allowing me to work flexibly and supporting me to get this PhD done.

statistics word cloudI am now starting to understand how challenging the next few months are going to be in balancing full time work with a part time PhD. I am still hoping to submit before the end of May next year to allow me to have a decent break afterwards (in the form of a family holiday). However, I now know there will be delays in my write up, there will be things that I just cannot do in time and there are things that will just have to wait (some until after my PhD). To be fair, I have just got over the fact that I wont be submitting my PhD in 2018 as I had planned from day 1 – I’m sure this is something I will joke about on New Year’s Eve!

This week I have already learned that I need to rest when I become unwell as I have managed to catch the dreaded office (or family visit induced?) cold. I am writing this as I start to pack up my desk for the day over the fear that I may vomit and I also may run out of tissues from constantly blowing my nose! My weekend (once I feel better of course) will finally be devoted to PhD work in the hope that I can get these thesis findings chopped back and edited. I also have the small challenge of two additional statistical surveys to analyse… lots to do and so little time left.

Image credits:

Reflections on ASIS&T and moving away from academia

img_6614.jpgMy final commitment as a full time PhD student was to attend and present at the ASIST conference. I got a paper accepted to this conference a while back and was scheduled to present my work on Tuesday November 13th 2018. The conference itself went very well and I am pleased I travelled so far for my trip. On Sunday November 11th I attended the doctoral workshop where we were assigned our own mentor. My mentor was Professor Caroline Haythornthwaite from Syracuse University (New York State) and she partly specialises in research of learning. Caroline and I were matched based upon our research interests and her expertise in terms of my doctoral work and I feel the meeting between us was beneficial indeed. Caroline gave some sound advice on how I can ground my literature in the information science domain. She gave some excellent examples of work that will help me in editing my literature review and enabled me to see how my work fits in with others in this field. We also chatted about my career plans and how I am embarking on a non-academic career next week. Caroline and I both agreed that this is the right thing for me to do (as I feel it is) and that there is no harm in investigating academic work in the future (we shall see!). The meeting with our mentors was followed by a panel session. We had experts in academia and those who have also pursued careers outside of academia. The discussions in the panel sessions surround academic careers and presenting ourselves when ready to apply for jobs. We also talked about issues in the workplace for academics and then moved onto other careers too. This part for me was the most interesting as I have chosen to undertake a job outside of academia. We heard from those who had been successful outside of academia, especially those who could tell us what we could do. We discussed the application of skills learned in the PhD to jobs outside of academic and it was nice to hear that this is actually welcomed (I have had a lot of people express their annoyance that I am leaving academia!). As students we learn a lot throughout our PhD journeys and we develop lots of skills – it is more about how we apply these skills to our work that interests those outside of academia than how many publications, presentations etc we have.

The main conference itself started just after the doctoral workshop with a keynote from Dr Ramesh Srinivasan, who explored the use of digital technologies which influence our world. This was followed by a variety of other activities including a new member induction and a welcome reception after a choice of paper and panel sessions. By this point on Sunday, I was wrecked (my brain was still in UK time you see).

The Monday followed a similar format and I was able to attend some paper and panel sessions myself. The morning panel session surround embodied information practices and our speakers (Professor Christopher Lueg, Professor Pan McKenzie and Dr Michael Olsson) talked about their own work in relation to how information practices and our experiences intertwine We even ended the session with a martial arts demonstration to evidence the embodied information practices we heard about. Other sessions that I attended were papers in the data sharing category and these papers focused on data reuse, reputation, trust and norms in data sharing and the use of web archives. You can see from the programme that these papers were very varied and something that might not initially interest me. However I was intrigued to find research in these areas and explore the information practices of data sharing in the many contexts the presenters discussed. Seeing as though I am going into a career that focuses on data and statistics, I supposed this session was important for me!IMG_6627.JPG

The Tuesday of the conference was the day of my own presentation – something I was quite nervous about. As I normally freak out (behind the scenes) when I need to present to a larger audiences I made sure I prepared fully for this one. This included a dry-run session with some members of my research group and also discussion the paper with some students in a class before my trip away. This helped me to decide how to present my work and tweak the presentation (and potential discussion points) so that I was prepared for what was to come. When the time came for my presentation I was cheered on from afar (i.e. Edinburgh!). I appeared not to be too nervous until the few minutes before I talked, but once I was up in front of the audience and presenting the nerves disappeared and I talked about my work with ease. For those of you who did not make my presentation you can find my slides here. You can also find a recording of a dry-run that I recorded in preparation for the conference here (apologies if you are unable to access this video – I had issues with the upload). I am pleased that my director of studies encouraged me to apply for this conference and for the support given by my supervisors when writing the paper. Had I not had their help, my paper probably would have been rejected completed. I am also thankful for the review of my paper carried out by Professor Brian Detlor – without his expertise the paper would have made no sense at all. For that, I appreciate his efforts and work.

I travelled back home to Edinburgh on the Wednesday and Thursday so I decided not to attend any of the additional sessions offered. My travel adventure getting to Vancouver was a bit of a nightmare but the return flights home were smooth and I am pleased to have my feet back on the ground.

I now embark on a new chapter of my life, studying for my PhD part time whilst working a full-time job. I know this will be a challenge, especially as my experiences of starting my new job will probably be slightly hindered by the impending jet lag that I am going to experience (it has not hit me fully yet). This means that I will have a change in PhD working pattern (working two days of the week) and a change in contact availability (i.e. not checking emails daily). I will also probably struggle at first with managing my PhD time and will probably feel like I do not want to continue with my work. However, as long as I am able to work from my own office with fellow PhD students to hand I think I will be able to cope okay with it all. I have given myself an unofficial PhD deadline as to when I would like to submit. I know that my PhD work will suffer in terms of slowed progress but I think having this deadline in my mind will help. Despite these challenges ahead, I also know that taking a new job was the right move for me!

Obviously the tourist version of Lyndsey took lots of photos in Vancouver (see them below):


This slideshow requires JavaScript.